Forums

Help › Forums

Robots and Attics

Fri, Jul 31 2015 3:00 PM (53 replies)
  • coolasicebaby
    142 Posts
    Fri, Jul 31 2015 6:19 AM

    Hi Two

    As long as you have legit Windows 7 or 8 at present you have no worries. The upgrade and Windows 10 will always be free. It is free to current legit Windows 7 owners. You wont get a serial key though with Windows 10 as they are doing it differently. Basically if you have windows 7 they know that and will always make your Windows 10 active and registered. I have been in the Insider Program for a long long time and can safely say Windows 10 has come a long long way. I was dubious also but after using it for so long and testing the final version I can definitely say it's a fantastic operating system with only very few bugs left.

    The Windows Store can sometimes crash and updates take a few attempts but once the teething problems are sorted it will be fantastic. It's certainly up there with Windows 7. A huge improvement is the boot up times which are super fast , and the new Edge Browser which is lightning quick as page load times. You can alternatively join the Insider program and test out Enterprise Edition if you required it but it's mainly aimed at Businesses.

    I would definitely recommend upgrading but entirely your choice sir.

    D

     

    PS: Found the blog post here from Terry Myerson.

    Terry Myerson, Microsoft’s Executive Vice President of Operating Systems. In it he states:

    “We announced that a free upgrade for Windows 10 will be made available to customers running Windows 7, Windows 8.1, and Windows Phone 8.1 who upgrade in the first year after launch. This is more than a one-time upgrade: once a Windows device is upgraded to Windows 10, we will continue to keep it current for the supported lifetime of the device – at no cost.”

  • PhiEaglesFan
    617 Posts
    Fri, Jul 31 2015 8:38 AM

    andyson:
    There are too many "non-critical" errors in the latest release.  Many of those errors are so obvious they should have been identified much earlier in development.   

    Indeed, they are that obvious, which immediately raises my suspicions.  Something is different enough between the live environment and testing environment(s) to cause these issues.  You and I both know they didn't send this update live knowing the cameras were even worse than before.  This deploy worked in the testing environment.  They wouldn't have pushed it otherwise.

    andyson:
    Personally I like something along the lines of "new changes will not affect existing functionality" because customers don't like it.

    Agreed.  Regression errors are for the birds.

    andyson:
    I'd vote that both the CC improvements and New Camera Views features would be low priority [....]

    True. However you also know that development doesn't stop if you finish 3 days early.  It's more like, "Oh, we got three days?  What small stuff can we squeeze in and get tested with minimal risk?"  Thus, you end up with things that appear incorrectly prioritized, but it's more about good time-management.  It was either those small things got in, or nothing.

    andyson:
    And those non-critical problems never show up in the Release criterial.

    I find that they tend to be taken care of without much fanfare.  I've found myself frequently saying, "Oh, I see they fixed that."  The small stuff like that kinda gets lumped into the "various bugs fixes" category.  I don't believe they have an obligation to tell us every single minor or trivial adjustment they make in that category.

    andyson:
    The bottom line is its not all about Schedule & Quality, Content has to be part of the decision making process.

    Agree.  But again, we both know that many of those schedule vs quality decisions have to be made at the 11th hour as everything either comes together or doesn't, and many times you're getting a "lesser of two evils" choice.  This is one of the flaws in Agile imo.  Or perhaps the result of its flawed execution.

    You better hope it all comes together at the end, else your schedule is in serious trouble and/or you're working a lot of free overtime.

  • andyson
    6,415 Posts
    Fri, Jul 31 2015 12:43 PM

    PhiEaglesFan:
    Indeed, they are that obvious, which immediately raises my suspicions.  Something is different enough between the live environment and testing environment(s) to cause these issues.  You and I both know they didn't send this update live knowing the cameras were even worse than before.  This deploy worked in the testing environment.  They wouldn't have pushed it otherwise.

    The way things have gone in prior releases, I'm not so sure of that! LOL  If it were me making the decisions, I'd bite the bullet and take the site down today, pull the new release, and go back to where we were Thursday morning.

    How could the testing environment be different from the live environment?  Is it a configuration management issue where the code tested is not the same as the released code?

  • alosso
    21,070 Posts
    Fri, Jul 31 2015 3:00 PM

    +1 Andyson!

    PhiEaglesFan:
    Indeed, they are that obvious, which immediately raises my suspicions.

    We, by repeat exposure, have made the step from suspicions to belief:
    QA in this company is likely to happen on a holodeck only.

RSS