Forums

Deleted

• PhilEStein 1,269 Posts

  Sun, Feb 5 2017 2:41 PM

  Maybe not so much lost as being shrugged off Doc. Started a few weeks ago and already making comments like an old hand. Like the game seems harder? Yeah, okay.

• Robert1893 7,722 Posts

  Sun, Feb 5 2017 3:02 PM

  PhilEStein:

  Maybe not so much lost as being shrugged off

  +1

  Simply because something isn't acknowledged does not mean it goes unnoticed or unrecognized. 

• Mcduff61 1,753 Posts

  Sun, Feb 5 2017 5:39 PM

    When I look at that score history it cries out that these super low rounds happen when maybe a friend stops by that's a seasoned champ  and gets on op's hardware , picking up 11 shots on the exact same RG in a day seems a little? when the rest of the scores are about what one might expect from this tier of player. OR maybe not , I am sure you guys that never play anything but your keyboard in the forums will correct me if I am wrong.

• Romax 1,876 Posts

  Sun, Feb 5 2017 9:33 PM

  .............................................................................................................................................................

  Make a post.......... reread thread later.......Soul search.....check for rudeness and cruelty......analyze..........Feel badly......delete.   (Explanation for the ...................above).

• 1,866 Posts

  Mon, Feb 6 2017 9:40 AM

  jayw4862:

  MBaggese:

  alanti:

   Truly remarkable.....

   

  So true...

  And to make it better (or worse in this case)...that's a WGT Mobile scorecard ;-)

  Is that why the score of 23 isn't in his score history? Although the 2 eagles and a DE are recorded in his activity.

   

• Robert1893 7,722 Posts

  Mon, Feb 6 2017 9:49 AM

  mkrizan86:

  Is that why the score of 23 isn't in his score history? Although the 2 eagles and a DE are recorded in his activity.

  No, the reason the 23 doesn't display in the score history is the 23 was part of an 18-hole round. 

• mbcarp99 1,078 Posts

  Mon, Feb 6 2017 10:11 AM

  Mcduff61:

    When I look at that score history it cries out that these super low rounds happen when maybe a friend stops by that's a seasoned champ  and gets on op's hardware , picking up 11 shots on the exact same RG in a day seems a little? when the rest of the scores are about what one might expect from this tier of player. OR maybe not , I am sure you guys that never play anything but your keyboard in the forums will correct me if I am wrong.

  im waiting for a seasoned champ to stop by and write my reply for me :))

• 1,866 Posts

  Mon, Feb 6 2017 10:50 AM

  Robert1893:

  mkrizan86:

  Is that why the score of 23 isn't in his score history? Although the 2 eagles and a DE are recorded in his activity.

  No, the reason the 23 doesn't display in the score history is the 23 was part of an 18-hole round. 

  Jeez, must've been a very crappy b9, cause all I could find on that day on PB was a 62 ;-)

  @ McDuff

  Apart from one (apparently) lucky 9 hole score, I can't see any seasond champ scores in his history. Could very well be that this is not the OPs 1st attemp at playing this game, but the skills are nowhere near seasoned champs. Mediocre legends, maybe. 

  Could just be a seasoned gamer, this game's not that difficult, if you put in some time and money and you understand things quickly. Gamers have a huge advantage over golfers here, cause golfers keep trying to play golf and choose shots, they would choose on the real course. While gamers just play the game and do what works here, even nobody wouzld ever try that on a real course.

   

• Robert1893 7,722 Posts

  Mon, Feb 6 2017 11:02 AM

  mkrizan86:

  Jeez, must've been a very crappy b9, cause all I could find on that day on PB was a 62 ;-)

  She edited her first post. Before she edited it, she mentioned that she shot a 37 on the back 9. I see a 60 in score history for February 3. That's probably it.
  
  But you're correct, that's a pretty crappy back 9 after shooting a 23. I'm not sure how one shoots a -13 on the front and a +1 on the back. That large of a discrepancy between 9s has to be some sort of record.  
  
  Edit:
  See post below. While I know I'm remembering correctly that she originally wrote she shot a 37 on the back 9, later in the thread she says it was a 39. Who knows? 

• mbcarp99 1,078 Posts

  Mon, Feb 6 2017 11:04 AM

  Robert1893:

  mkrizan86:

  Jeez, must've been a very crappy b9, cause all I could find on that day on PB was a 62 ;-)

  She edited her first post. Before she edited it, she mentioned that she shot a 37 on the back 9. I see a 60 in score history for February 3. That's probably it.
  
  But you're correct, that's a pretty crappy back 9 after shooting a 23. I'm not sure how one shoots a -13 on the front and a +1 on the back. That large of a discrepancy between 9s has to be some sort of record.  

  She stated earlier in the thread that the B9 was a 39, the B9 is a bit tougher though :)))