Forums

Help › Forums

cheat programs

Wed, Nov 24 2021 11:47 PM (518 replies)
  • mantis0014
    8,946 Posts
    Fri, Jul 8 2011 4:43 PM

    thebigeasy707:

    ain't folks sick to f*cking death hearing about idiotic cheat programs yet?

    i could care less about them or what ar$eholes use them and choose to concentrate more on my game rather than silly people who feel they need to use a cheat to play this simple enough game in order to steal credits or lie to themselves that they've fairly mastered clicking a mouse.

    anyone using them strikes me as someone who cannot even point their sex organs in the right direction when taking a pi$.

    TBE.

    Very good reply TBE...lol... Money drives  people to insanity and the only way they can get it playing this game is using these dreaded programs...hmmm. hip hip hooray to them. When you get get people like us, who has come up through the ranks, spent their money to upgrade the clubs, playing thousand plus ranked rounds, getting in the practice and still shooting the low scores and enjoying the game like it should be enjoyed.... I too say to the people using the C Programs the same thing!! (I won't say what I really think..lol)

    I don't have a problem with the meter anymore, just the occasional meter spike which gets me all the time..lol. After quite a few times hitting the Ding, the meter starts to play up. My thinking is Wgt knows about the cheat programs and unless they catch somebody using them, they can't do much about it. The only way is when you start to Ding often, then the game will meter spike you, thinking that you might be using a cheat program.

    Cheers

       Roger

  • Infinito3010
    3,689 Posts
    Fri, Jul 8 2011 10:25 PM

    LizzieRossetti:

    I write them for a chortle. Are you married Shade?

    Lizzie xx

    Hi Liz;

    LOL, think you are on the wrong site, try a dating site. Great humor Liz lmao.

    These types of threads (Cheating Programs) are humorous, and sad at the same time.  A long time ago I used to put my input into these threads.  But, fortunately, I have better things to do with my time.

    What comes to mind after the Virtual Open is retirement.

  • MBaggese
    15,367 Posts
    Sat, Jul 9 2011 1:16 AM

    Just to reiterate, ya'll cheats till  qualify..ifn I do..alls well, if I don't, everyone cheats.

     

    Seems simple to me.

     

     

    Oh...I love the Chocolate Icecream my 9yo picked out.

  • mantis0014
    8,946 Posts
    Sat, Jul 9 2011 3:00 AM

    Infinito3010:

    LizzieRossetti:

    I write them for a chortle. Are you married Shade?

    Lizzie xx

    Hi Liz;

    LOL, think you are on the wrong site, try a dating site. Great humor Liz lmao.

    These types of threads (Cheating Programs) are humorous, and sad at the same time.  A long time ago I used to put my input into these threads.  But, fortunately, I have better things to do with my time.

    What comes to mind after the Virtual Open is retirement.

    Lizzie... I'm single. If you ever come down to my country look me up :)

    Infinito... Great golfers never retire, they just get better :)

    Cheers

       Roger

  • x1524807
    776 Posts
    Sat, Jul 9 2011 4:59 AM

    TonyTurbo78:
    I really didnt want to come in here and discuss any of this, to be honest I'm tired of the whole "I cant play that well so you must be cheating" mentality.  I

    please count the number of times the word "I" appears in your post

  • chrisironsbones
    3,524 Posts
    Sat, Jul 9 2011 11:21 AM

    LizzieRossetti:

    D'wean sharrad cwmraeg

    Lizzie xx

    Da iwan ti (very good) i give you an A+ for trying, i understand what you're trying to say, spelling could do better LOL

  • casperturk
    484 Posts
    Sat, Jul 9 2011 11:50 AM

    LizzieRossetti:

    TOP SECRET NEW CHEAT

    Once this operation has been achieved, you must now calm the pooch until such times as you are ready to take your shot, at which time, you draw his attention to the trail of dog treats you cunningly laid earlier. He should then set about grazing his way throught the trail of treats.  It might take some trial and error to get the spacing of treats just-so, but well worth it in my opinion. 

    What a brilliant idea. Having two dogs, one at 14 kilos and one at 11 Kilos, i could, of course, swop them depending on whether i'm using my G10's or Raptures to keep a consistent meter speed.

    My only concern is you haven't factored in the co-efficient of friction (as the dog is pulled back) depending on whether they're on a carpet, tiled floor, wooden desk etc, etc.

    I found this which may help you in your experiments:

    Let's say, for convenience, that we're on a planet where g = 1 m/s^2,

    With a high-friction mass of m = 1 kg that we are pulling downward (assisting 
    gravity) with just the right force to compensate for friction and 
    cause it not to accelerate at all. And let's say that the force we 
    have to apply is
     (5 - sqrt(3))/2 N ~= 1.64 Newtons.
    
    The force due to gravity is mg sin(theta), or 1*1*sqrt(3)/2. So this 
    force, combined with the one we are providing, yields a total downward 
    force of 5/2.
    Since the object doesn't accelerate, friction must be equal and 
    opposite to the downward force:
    
         (mu)*m*g*cos(theta) = 5/2
         (mu)*1*1*1/2 = 5/2
          mu = 5
    This can be thought of as a rough definition of mu_(kinetic) 
    It is the value that makes the friction equation balance with the 

      amount of force required to prevent frictional deceleration.

    
    
    
    Casper

     

  • SweetiePie
    4,925 Posts
    Sat, Jul 9 2011 12:14 PM

    Without math manufactured by a brain that doesn't need to know, everything is moving super fast...the obvious...just the way it works...fact of the Universe.

  • LizzieRossetti
    1,545 Posts
    Sat, Jul 9 2011 2:40 PM

    Oh but CasperT, your find takes account only of an inanimate object belaboured with a given rate of required calcitronic mass reduction, whereby such common factors as are present will remain constant on a decreasing scale dependant upon no other factor other than degeneration owing to passive yet non aggressive resistance over a real time equation base determined by the original specific gravity in possession at any given time.

    The admirable intent of your findings is nonetheless worthy except that chewing gum has more in the way of reliable vaccilitude than the author would have known, if I am correct in my assumption that you quote an extract from the now famous stability findings of Dr. Alan D Kerschwin in his paper presented to the Formological Society in the Spring of 1932, where he was later to preside for a short while as Chairman Pro Tem during the two months and three days of what we now call the " illogicallity Hearings ". As you would know, where Dr A. D. Kerschwin would not, Juicy fruit had at that time yet to be formulated. One must therefore wonder how different the outcome of those hearings might have been, were this information available but as they say, " History is Our story too ".

    Lizzie xx

RSS