Forums

Help › Forums

Forums » Welcome to WGT » Announcements & News » cheat programs

cheat programs

Wed, Nov 24 2021 11:47 PM (518 replies)

PAGES

First

Last

jaycen129

193 Posts

Sat, Jul 9 2011 6:20 PM

WOW!!!! I just spent 30 minutes of my life reading this forum alone. Very funny stuff along with some things I don't believe make any sense what so ever!

CHEERS!

Jaycen

OkieX

175 Posts

Sat, Jul 9 2011 6:46 PM

i don't have 30 mins to waste catching up with this thread so if someone could plz just email or PM one of these cheat programs I would 'preciate it.

Tired of being a whipping boy for Tour Masters in MPC.

a10koaksfed

6 Posts

Sat, Jul 9 2011 7:26 PM

I won't read it AND I won't enter any tourneys that cost $$$. It's obvious when individuals shoot -18 at the Virtual British Open that they have found a way to cheat. Unless the individuals that run this site decide to clean it up, I'm thru investing cash on anything.

Yes, I'm a Tour Master, but I don't come anywhere near the scores some of these individuals post. Cheating is cheating, whether it's here or on your taxes. Maybe the winner should be polygraphed when they show up at their PRIZE winning event. Pass and the trip is free. Fail and you pay $5,000. I bet the scores would be a lot more realistic then.

DISGUSTED WITH WGT.

Sanco

1,345 Posts

Sat, Jul 9 2011 7:42 PM

Just search for them over at youtube or google for them ... just be aware that whatever you will find will be a figment of your imagination for they don't exist and nobody uses them :)

navigater

1,319 Posts

Sat, Jul 9 2011 8:55 PM

LizzieRossetti:

Oh but CasperT, your find takes account only of an inanimate object belaboured with a given rate of required calcitronic mass reduction, whereby such common factors as are present will remain constant on a decreasing scale dependant upon no other factor other than degeneration owing to passive yet non aggressive resistance over a real time equation base determined by the original specific gravity in possession at any given time.

The admirable intent of your findings is nonetheless worthy except that chewing gum has more in the way of reliable vaccilitude than the author would have known, if I am correct in my assumption that you quote an extract from the now famous stability findings of Dr. Alan D Kerschwin in his paper presented to the Formological Society in the Spring of 1932, where he was later to preside for a short while as Chairman Pro Tem during the two months and three days of what we now call the " illogicallity Hearings ". As you would know, where Dr A. D. Kerschwin would not, Juicy fruit had at that time yet to be formulated. One must therefore wonder how different the outcome of those hearings might have been, were this information available but as they say, " History is Our story too ".

Lizzie xx