Forums

Ettiquette

• LizzieRossetti 1,545 Posts

  Mon, Apr 2 2012 3:49 AM

  Infinito3010:

  I would almost think you are talking about the Lambert wave function

   

  What!

  And get myself enmeshed in infinite tetration?

  Well maybe, but only if WGT agree to enumerate all the trees on Oakmont.

   

  Lizzie xx

• overtheedge 5,885 Posts

  Mon, Apr 2 2012 3:59 AM

  ETTIQUETTE! The hell with that! Lets talk about dropping a hit of mescaline and sit around with Lizzie R and truly discover what "Ettiquette" REALLY means. Just a little fun Lizzie. edge

• JaLaBar 1,254 Posts

  Mon, Apr 2 2012 4:07 AM

  Infinitely better, but then we could have elected a turd and we'd have been better off than we were with Bush.  Yes, the country is much, much better off with Obama than we were with Bush.  However, not nearly as well off as we'd be if the rest of the GOP invalids in Congress would get the hell out of the way and let the man do what he was elected by a majority of Americans to do.  The true UN-Americans are those that prevented, through base obstruction, the governance of our country by a duly elected leader.  So, the GOP prevents Obama from carrying out most of what he wanted to get done, most of what he was duly elected by a majority to do.  So yes, to anyone with even a modicum of intelligence, anyone that isn't a mindless right-wing sheep, the country is much better off than we were with Bush.  And, since there aren't currently any persons in the GOP that would be fractionally as good for the country as Obama, he'll win again in 2012 and, as he won't be fighting for re-election, he'll be more able to make more of the changes this country needs to resume our standing in the world.  Bush may have been by far the worst president in the recorded history of presidents (of anything... Student Council, PTA, etc.... Bush was the worst president in the history of there being Presidents), but still the damage he did wasn't irreparable, and a competent, quality President like Obama will be able to fix it if the GOP wants the country improved.  

  So Obama, the second best President of my lifetime (hint: the best survived a *** impeachment), has got another 4 years to fix the mess Bush left him.  Now, let's see... what parts of the country are NOT better off than they were before Obama took office.  Well, the average citizen is better off, despite the GOP's efforts to make sure that no one is better off.

  So, my problem isn't Obama.  My problem is the GOP lawmakers who should by all right be jailed for treason.  Attempting to cause Obama to 'fail' as a President, which has been the GOP's stated goal, is by nature attempting to cause harm to the country and thus a treasonous act.  So, let's get those criminals out of the way, then we can judge Obama by what he has done rather than by what a bunch of unAmericans tried to prevent him from doing.

• Infinito3010 3,689 Posts

  Mon, Apr 2 2012 4:10 AM

  LizzieRossetti:

  Infinito3010:

  I would almost think you are talking about the Lambert wave function

   

  What!

  And get myself enmeshed in infinite tetration?

  Well maybe, but only if WGT agree to enumerate all the trees on Oakmont.

   

  Lizzie xx

  Just a little humor:

  W=x*e^x:   This is called the lambert wave function

• nanstar 4,914 Posts

  Mon, Apr 2 2012 4:34 AM

  JaLaBar:

  but then we could have elected a turd

  We did.

  Swap you Gillard for Obama.

• Johniedino 786 Posts

  Mon, Apr 2 2012 5:09 AM

  JaLaBar:

  Infinitely better, but then we could have elected a turd and we'd have been better off than we were with Bush.  Yes, the country is much, much better off with Obama than we were with Bush.  However, not nearly as well off as we'd be if the rest of the GOP invalids in Congress would get the hell out of the way and let the man do what he was elected by a majority of Americans to do.  The true UN-Americans are those that prevented, through base obstruction, the governance of our country by a duly elected leader.  So, the GOP prevents Obama from carrying out most of what he wanted to get done, most of what he was duly elected by a majority to do.  So yes, to anyone with even a modicum of intelligence, anyone that isn't a mindless right-wing sheep, the country is much better off than we were with Bush.  And, since there aren't currently any persons in the GOP that would be fractionally as good for the country as Obama, he'll win again in 2012 and, as he won't be fighting for re-election, he'll be more able to make more of the changes this country needs to resume our standing in the world.  Bush may have been by far the worst president in the recorded history of presidents (of anything... Student Council, PTA, etc.... Bush was the worst president in the history of there being Presidents), but still the damage he did wasn't irreparable, and a competent, quality President like Obama will be able to fix it if the GOP wants the country improved.  

  So Obama, the second best President of my lifetime (hint: the best survived a *** impeachment), has got another 4 years to fix the mess Bush left him.  Now, let's see... what parts of the country are NOT better off than they were before Obama took office.  Well, the average citizen is better off, despite the GOP's efforts to make sure that no one is better off.

  So, my problem isn't Obama.  My problem is the GOP lawmakers who should by all right be jailed for treason.  Attempting to cause Obama to 'fail' as a President, which has been the GOP's stated goal, is by nature attempting to cause harm to the country and thus a treasonous act.  So, let's get those criminals out of the way, then we can judge Obama by what he has done rather than by what a bunch of unAmericans tried to prevent him from doing.

  Spoken like a true brain washed left wing liberal pinko. What needs to be done is kick the whole bunch of the pukes out on their a$$es and let em live like us normal folks.

  They have made a mockery of the way government should work. They  are all a bunch of no good GDCB. Dems. and REP. alike. 

   

• angelsgolfing 211 Posts

  Mon, Apr 2 2012 5:17 AM

  Johniedino:

  JaLaBar:

  Infinitely better, but then we could have elected a turd and we'd have been better off than we were with Bush.  Yes, the country is much, much better off with Obama than we were with Bush.  However, not nearly as well off as we'd be if the rest of the GOP invalids in Congress would get the hell out of the way and let the man do what he was elected by a majority of Americans to do.  The true UN-Americans are those that prevented, through base obstruction, the governance of our country by a duly elected leader.  So, the GOP prevents Obama from carrying out most of what he wanted to get done, most of what he was duly elected by a majority to do.  So yes, to anyone with even a modicum of intelligence, anyone that isn't a mindless right-wing sheep, the country is much better off than we were with Bush.  And, since there aren't currently any persons in the GOP that would be fractionally as good for the country as Obama, he'll win again in 2012 and, as he won't be fighting for re-election, he'll be more able to make more of the changes this country needs to resume our standing in the world.  Bush may have been by far the worst president in the recorded history of presidents (of anything... Student Council, PTA, etc.... Bush was the worst president in the history of there being Presidents), but still the damage he did wasn't irreparable, and a competent, quality President like Obama will be able to fix it if the GOP wants the country improved.  

  So Obama, the second best President of my lifetime (hint: the best survived a *** impeachment), has got another 4 years to fix the mess Bush left him.  Now, let's see... what parts of the country are NOT better off than they were before Obama took office.  Well, the average citizen is better off, despite the GOP's efforts to make sure that no one is better off.

  So, my problem isn't Obama.  My problem is the GOP lawmakers who should by all right be jailed for treason.  Attempting to cause Obama to 'fail' as a President, which has been the GOP's stated goal, is by nature attempting to cause harm to the country and thus a treasonous act.  So, let's get those criminals out of the way, then we can judge Obama by what he has done rather than by what a bunch of unAmericans tried to prevent him from doing.

  Spoken like a true brain washed left wing liberal pinko. What needs to be done is kick the whole bunch of the pukes out on their a$es and let em live like us normal folks.

  They have made a mockery of the way government should work. They  are all a bunch of no good GDCB. Dems. and REP. alike. 

   

  no truer words have a man spoke. anyone who thinks this country his headed in the right direction under obama has not opened there eyes to the mass downfall in goverment today. he is a self serving man with no agenda for our country to move us up & help the people who need it.

• mantis0014 8,946 Posts

  Mon, Apr 2 2012 6:01 AM

  nanstar:

  JaLaBar:

  but then we could have elected a turd

  We did.

   

  Swap you Gillard for Obama.

  Now that's Funny.....lol. I think that might be a great trade...lol

• OmegaManKFH 113 Posts

  Mon, Apr 2 2012 6:39 AM

  angelsgolfing:

  OmegaManKFH:

  I am thoroughly amazed that this thread has been allowed for this long. Shame on the Admins/Moderators for this.

  Some of you folks would benefit from some schooling of your own, with the way some of you spell. And I'm not talking about the occasional fat fingering of the keyboard.  Nothing makes a person look more ignorant than piss poor spelling. Especially in your native language. Therefore, anyone from another country would be exempt from this statement. 

  God? Don't get me started. I don't care what your beliefs. If you can't respect someone else's, then you don't deserve any respect for yours. 

  All this because someone didn't like a picture? I don't buy it. 

  These threads should never be allowed to get past the first posting. It is my opinion(not that it counts here) that it should be removed, immediately and in it's entirety. I have never seen politics and religion allowed in a gaming forum before. Those posts are always removed. 

  I'm beginning to think the Admins like to see this kind of thing get out of hand. Doesn't say much for WGT staff, now does it? 

  well what do you know ? wgt has hired a spell checker & grammar teacher. man why don,t you go read dear abby or garfield? us old southern boys are doing just find without your school lesson  lol 

  "doing just "find"?"  You didn't quite make it through 2nd grade, did you?

  Angelsgolfing: I brawt me a gunn to tha gunnfite. Butt, wut arr thim thar bullets ya'all keep tawkin' `bout? Lordee!!

• Mem11 199 Posts

  Mon, Apr 2 2012 8:47 AM

  JaLaBar:

  The true UN-Americans are those that prevented, through base obstruction, the governance of our country by a duly elected leader.

  Wow, another constitutional scholar...  You do realize we do not have an imperial presidency don't you???  The federal government is made of three equal branches - The Legislative, The Executive and The Judiciary.  Sorry the Executive has no more power than the other two.  You might actual like to read the Constitution - pretty good stuff.

  JaLaBar:

  So, the GOP prevents Obama from carrying out most of what he wanted to get done, most of what he was duly elected by a majority to do.

  If memory serves me correctly, the Democrats had a filibusterer proof majority in the Senate and a large majority in the House for about 2 years, so really they have nobody to blame but themselves for not passing everything the President wanted.

  Guess what, 2 years later we had an election at which time the majority overwhelming rejected the Presidents policy by electing scads of Republicans.  As the President said, elections have consequences.