sarak362336:
Well Eric - if thats the way its going I will be off......
I can only speak for myself - I find the game difficult enough as it is without the randomness of ULs. I find constantly playing tournys in high winds a lottery and not a great deal of fun.
There are an elite bunch of players on here who as with any game dominate. I realise I am not in that league and play the game for fun - when it becomes mentally draining just to hit a green or land a fairway the enjoyment ceases for me.
Those who wish for the extra challenge I respect your views, but it is not for me.
Sara
That is the point Sara, that small group of players dominating the scene will ALSO be in trouble when landing on rough of big sloped fairway, or at least from rough they would have to find FIRST fairway then going for the flag, those players will have to be "less greedy" and accept; first fairway, then green and not; rough then green, in most cases..just like in reality.
Again Sara, you learn the UL properly, you'll get good scores, that group of players will have to submit bad scores too. The way it is now, that group would simply the sh..t out of any us "regular" legends. I think this feature will make all of us more alike (scoring talking).
What I like about this feature is that; on a good day you could be beaten the scores of any of those "gifted" players....and I always come back to the "a good 70 for qualifying would be great!. I see it already some top players submitting high 60´s and even low 70's...awesome!. I am personally tired of seeing those low 50's in important qualifying tournes..a high 60 is more "realistic".
I do not think the UL is so precise as it is now, some things still could be better, more dots on the UL grid for example, bigger fairway/rough grid too for more information and the best I hope it get released...the draw-fade with the woods an low irons.
Cheers, Eric