Forums

Looking for New Members

• Nancy1959 7,452 Posts

  Mon, Nov 7 2016 1:13 AM

  pdb1:

   I will stay out of this thread .. I never should have responded to anything here .

  Yeah, right!  That lasted a day, LOL!

  ~Nancy

• nanstar 4,914 Posts

  Mon, Nov 7 2016 4:32 AM

• BabeLincoln 3,080 Posts

  Mon, Nov 7 2016 1:48 PM

  Paul, the reason Dave wrote that you were only making "you and your CC look bad" by your posts on our CC thread, is that you ARE making yourself look bad. And since you are the OWNER of a CC, you are by default making your CC look bad, as you are the leader there. He didn't say it made your CC MEMBERS look bad as it has nothing to do with them....but rather you and your CC with you as their leader. Just do yourself a favor and stay off of this thread (unless, of course you want to name a CC or two of the MANY you claim that get way more participation than we do.....although I don't understand how you can actually have more particpation than 100% of membership posting a score in CC tournaments). Or maybe you want to enlighten us of a CC or two of the MANY that have tournament giveaways that average over $50.00 PER MEMBER in a calendar year! Otherwise, just stay out of here, PLEASE! You would be doing yourself a big favor....and to the rest of us, too.

• BabeLincoln 3,080 Posts

  Mon, Nov 7 2016 6:17 PM

  Name ONE CC over 20 members that regularly gets 100% of their members posting scores in their tournaments, Paul!   Name ONE that is way more generous than ours is!

  That is how all of your nonsense on here started.   A couple of our members posted about our participation and giveaways....you then felt somehow compelled to call me and others a "liar" and to say that MANY CC's have much more in those areas than we do, and there has been a lot of back-and-forth since then.  You are STILL claiming those things on our thread and you have failed to produce even ONE CC for us (and nobody else has either).

  I am aware of one CC that sometimes gets around 100 members playing in a CC tournament, which is FANTASTIC (and also extremely rare), but it still only represents about 75% participation of their membership.  75% participation in just ONE of our CC stroke play tournaments is an extremely poor turnout for us compared to what we usually get.

  Since Paul is unable to give us the names of those "dozens" of CC's, maybe some of you other readers might be able to enlighten us?

• Nancy1959 7,452 Posts

  Mon, Nov 7 2016 7:30 PM

  pdb1:

    I'm done .

   

  Yes...please!