I have to admit when I first read the word, it jarred, but not in a bad way, rather because the context had already been established and adding "ation" was somewhat unnecessary since the intent was already in place.
Whilst this particular word does not yet appear in the definitions given by the OED, this does not however mean, that the word either has no meaning, or cannot exist. The OED is and always has been open to new words, derivatives and definitions pertaining to existing words, indeed in the very beginning, the team then working on collating and editing grossly underestimated the time they felt it would take to complete. It was realised then as now, that the English language was a constantly evolving entity, many of the words and work on the words coming at that time from a single source, namely a recluse who more or less filled every room in his house with the equivilant of sticky notes for later dissemination. In this respect, perhaps TBE can be considered an innovator before the fact. Either that or he can apply to have his word entered into the Lizzie lexicon.
The suffix appended to the word is not in itself unusual and neither is the new word itself given current idiomatic progress, with words such as Burglarize to replace burgle, and Bombify to replace Bomb, making their way into common usage for example.
The point made then, that this word does not have verifiable fact to support its' usage, must therefore stand, but it would be churlish to attempt criminalisation based upon such slender a thread as we have before us.
Therefore I submit that we strive for a compromisation of Mios' criminalisation with the utmost perspicacity.
Lizzie xx