WGTadmin2:Honestly we have not really commented on this thread because it is a bit hard to tease out the feature requests.
Your defense of "not really commented" by linking it to "because it is...hard to tease out...feature requests" is a cop-out. One has nothing to do with the other. A analogy would be Car and Driver saying, "We're not going to comment on any 2015 Chevrolet models until all safety issues are resolved." Would it really be too difficult to have occasionally said "Maybe possible", "Being looked at", "We're considering", etc.?
WGTadmin2: I am sorry if you feel we are not responsive, but for each product suggestion we need to scope , assess feasibility and ultimately engineer and develop. We just updated the thread on what is coming up next.
"..we are unresponsive" because "we need to scope..."
Same cop-out answer.
Being "sorry" helps but is of little consolation at this point. Thank you for the link. The info is better late then never but the "code of silence" used until it was put together was/is a major part of the problem.