gilman10:
Why should you restrict my ability (or anyone elses) to buy equipment since you can play better and got to legend with worse clubs than me? Its a fact better equipment can save you strokes and make you a better player. Why are you inventing all of these crazy schemes of which you claim will make the game fairer. It actually wont because you are forcing those players to have worse equipment than you.
Look deep down and face it. This is about changing the way that guy plays for no good reason other than you want to beat him in match play. Just ignore him and he bothers no1 and you dont end up ruining the experience for a player like me who is busting his ass to get to legend with the G10 driver and irons, but cant quite make it. Buying the R11 and burners would help get me there, but if we had it your way I wouldnt have access.
No, actually... what we are talking about is combating sandbagging, but if you want to go there...
OK, you can get all the equipment I can, if every tourney you play, where you are in any way competing against me, I get to hit from your tees, and play on your greens. Why should I have to play from tees farther back than you do? Well, I do... it's the cost of making Legend. As the benefit of making Legend, I get equipment you can't. It's a fair trade. But if you want access to all my equipment, then fine... we'll level the playing field as far as greens and tees go too. Sound good?
No, what this is about is YOU wanting to play from the ladies tees and still use the same gear the men use. It's bout YOU wanting to keep the unfair advantage that YOU have over the higher tiers. Trying to turn it around is clever, but ultimately fruitless.
However, for me I don't advocate a change in the availability of equipment. I advocate a change in the way tiers are achieved. They should factor winnings into tier position, whether through a separate winnings based ladder where you could tier EITHER through X avg. over Y games OR through X winnings at Y tier. Or they could create a hybrid where every 100 credits won shaves .1 off a virtual average that is only used for tier elevation. So if you are a TM with a 62 average, and you have won 1100 credits at TM, your effective average becomes 60.90 and you move to Legend. Sure, the limiting of equipment would curtail the sandbagging, but if you factor winnings into tier elevation, you curtail the sandbaggers AND the dual-accounters, which to me are a much more serious problem.
Limiting the equipment available at tiers hurts the sand-baggers, but ends up helping the dual-accounts, because they know they will be able to play the same equipment as the others in their tier, and with their experience have a better chance.