I know the poster has proof, she said so. My point was her asking WGT to do something without something in the request to prove the case wasn't going to get anything done. That's where the he said/she said came from.
The proof shown here would suffice, I imagine, but it has to be sent off to them. Threatening or attempting to blackmail the offender is rather pointless. I doubt this bewitched one would care.
*edit- After rereading Rosie's post it appears I assumed she had sent this to WGT. Apparently not. It looks like she was giving the benefit of the doubt here and giving the offender a chance to step up. FWIW, people that think like the offender does are hardly about to step up and apologize, IMO.